Four readings, one pass
The price, the schedule, the package interfaces and the change exposure, read against one set of documents rather than four times by four people.
Home Packages Full Pre-GMP Review
This page is about buying the review. The work itself is described on the Pre-GMP Readiness Review page, which is where the method, the documents we read and the findings are set out in full.
Three to four weeks from the day the complete document set arrives. Quoted as a fixed fee against that set, never hourly.
The same four modules that are sold separately, run together in one pass so that a finding in one is tested against the other three.
The price, the schedule, the package interfaces and the change exposure, read against one set of documents rather than four times by four people.
Not four reports to reconcile. One document stating the position, ranked by exposure, with the connections between the four readings written down.
The GMP Risk Register, the Coverage Map, the Contingency Adequacy Assessment and the Owner Negotiation Memo, each citing the page it came from.
One before your signing date to walk the memo through, and one after the negotiation to read what came back from the contractor, line by line.
The long lead items and unbought packages with the date each must be ordered by, so the handover date is tested before it is signed.
The sentences on markup, rates, credits and reporting that change what every future change order costs, drafted for your counsel to review.
Three conditions. Where any of them is not met, one of the other packages usually fits better and we will say which.
Where the guaranteed maximum price will govern two years of decisions, the full reading is worth more than any single module.
Below three weeks the full reading does not fit, and the rapid version covers the largest exposures in the time that is left.
The four modules need drawings, a schedule and a procurement log. Where those are thin, we say so before quoting rather than after.
| Fee | Fixed, quoted against a named document set listed in the engagement. Not hourly and not a percentage of what the review finds. |
|---|---|
| Payment | Fifty percent on engagement, fifty percent before the final deliverable is released. |
| The clock | Three to four weeks, starting when the complete document set arrives rather than when the engagement is signed. |
| Included | One kickoff call, one readout call before your signing date, and one call after the negotiation. |
| Add on | A lender or investment committee memo written from the same findings, five working days after the review. |
Questions about the work itself are answered on the service page. These are the commercial ones.
Yes, and sometimes that is right. What separate purchase loses is the pass where the four readings are set against each other, which is where the compounding findings come from. A schedule risk that is also a procurement gap and an allowance shortfall is one exposure, not three.
We say so before quoting. An incomplete set is not a reason to refuse the work, but it changes what the review can conclude, and the fee should reflect a narrower scope rather than a full one delivered against missing documents.
No. No fee of ours is tied to what a review concludes, on any engagement. It is the only arrangement under which a memo saying the price is sound means anything, and it is why we can charge the same for that memo as for one listing thirty findings.
Yes, and the rapid work is not repeated. What was already read carries across, so the full review picks up at the schedule, the interfaces and the change exposure. You pay the difference between the two fees rather than both of them.
Every package runs the same method. What changes is how much of it runs, how fast, and who the document has to survive being read by. The packages overview sets the four against each other.